Sunday 27 October 2013

Canadian Senate Saga: as the world turns

     Senators Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau. (REUTERS)
Senators Mike Duffy (left), Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau. (REUTERS)
   

     I feel compelled to address the story captivating Canadians this week — the one front and centre that has grabbed the attention of many, who otherwise, pay little attention to the happenings in the political arena. 


     It kept the news media on their toes as they related the on-going Senate Saga — often with a new twist — in the drama, unfolding hourly. 
     Our Canadian Senate, composed of 105 members, is our only non-elected legislature in the country, appointed by the Governor General in agreement with the acting Prime Minister. 
     

     Their meetings are held in what is often referred to as the red chamber, lavishly decorated with red cloth that adorns the chamber as well as the throne.   

     
     The decorative scheme was inherited from the British House of Parliament, though theirs is lavished with red benches, as well.  
     Growing up in my family, I was taught respect for all human beings. These could include: the elderly, those in authority over me, such as my boss, my teachers, my pastor, those in governing positions, such as our Prime Minister and others in legislative authority, including the Queen, the head of the Commonwealth, of which I am a part. 
     I heard these words a lot in my family: trust, honesty, love, peace, respect, credibility, integrity, good-manners, kindness, self-control — all necessary, I was told, for successful living.   
     Developing these character-traits would be wise, should I ever consider a role of leadership in any field. 
     The main role of these Canadian Senators, is to provide "sober second thought" in legislation, on work done by the House of Commons.

     I am sure many have purposed to carry out their duties well and have done so. The concerns now facing several of these respected servants of our government are legitimate and need to be addressed fairly and sanely to the satisfaction of all involved. I emphasize "sanely!" 

     
     Someone labeled the continuing discussions as a soap opera, with many of the aforementioned character-traits missing... replaced instead, with such words as: dishonesty, distrust, lack of credibility, jealousy, enmity, even with outbursts of bashing, etc. 

     
     What a disreputable example for our young voters and our leaders of tomorrow! 
     

     Surely those representing us in our government are mature enough to calmly find peaceful solutions to the problems that arise, meanwhile treating each other with respect and dignity. 

     May God help those in authority over us.

— beulah

No comments:

Post a Comment